gwyn: (willow pronoun)
[personal profile] gwyn
Since it’s a fairly big Yankee holiday here in the states, I figured I wouldn’t spend a lot of time on a usage thing this week. It’s usually pretty quiet round these here parts. Instead, I thought I’d focus on something that tends to add to the overall confusion about usage and writing/betaing, but that’s more thematic than grammatical — the difference between pet peeves (or hot button issues, or misunderstandings and misinformation, however you want to view it) and real correct or incorrect usage.

A long time ago on one of my lists, [livejournal.com profile] sherrold compiled the biggest fanfic pet peeves of listmembers, most of whom are really into language and usage and grammar. And they’re great peeves, wonderful peeves (although clearly written before Spike became a huge BSO in the market, because of course he’s the exception to the “no media fans” rule), but they are, for the most part, not about right or wrong grammar beyond the most basic things like the punctuation peeves. We all have peeves. I myself have lots of them, peeves I nurture and treasure and won’t let go of, and most of my peeves aren’t even pets, but fairly large barnyard animals. But I also recognize that many of them are writing or word use peeves and not necessarily based in a correct grammar for English, or about syntax, or structure, or anything else. Some of them are — such as the possessive apostrophe I mentioned a couple weeks ago — but for the most part, my peeves were developed at an early age and nurtured over the years.

Most of us actually develop language and usage peeves from someone else. The vast majority of what drives us nuts is stuff we were taught was “right” or “wrong” in school, and if the information that was given us isn’t actually correct itself, then we’re hanging on to, essentially, someone else’s personal dislikes and being driven crazy by them over time. The biggest lesson I learned as I became a more experienced copy editor was finding out just how damn much I didn’t know. I had all these notions — about apostrophes, about words like impact as a verb and hopefully to mean “it is to be hoped” and stuff — and over and over, I kept finding out I was wrong. Wronger than wrong. But these things had been taught to me in school -- never end a sentence with a preposition (utter bullshit, since that rule is based on Latin grammar and has nothing to do with how English is structured); never begin a sentence with and or but (again, there’s just no real reason); don’t split infinitives (truly one of the more bogus rules of all time — if it aids clarity, don’t split the infinitive, if it doesn’t matter, boldly go where no man has gone before and feel good about it!), and so on and so on. All stuff I had to abandon by the wayside and now my peeves sit there like war orphans, all wrapped up in their shabby clothing, sitting by the side of the road.

I cherished my notions of ‘til being correct because, by gum, that’s what my teachers told me. Only, come to find out just recently, till has a much longer history, and until came long after till. I look back on my fanfic and go “arg!” because of course I have all those ‘tils in there. The history of my belief in peeves is all, sadly, in print. Like me, most of you are probably carrying around years of peeve indoctrination by teachers and other adults in our lives, from writing books we read, from other fans who told us how to do it, etc. Some of them are probably based on basic rules of real English grammar, but a shocking number are not. It’s one reason I’m reluctant to write anything that tells people what to do, because every time I’m certain that someone can’t do that, I check out the OED (I hate them! They always have some citation of just what I said couldn’t be done) and sure enough, it’s been done that way for hundreds of years. Remember how you were told over and over that ain’t ain’t in the dictionary? Well, not only is it in every dictionary, but for years, relatively educated people said it all the time. They also, especially in British English, used subjects and verbs that didn’t quite agree in the modern sense we expect them to. There’s this whole big history for English usage, but much of it isn’t accurately reported to us in school, so we’re carrying around the misonceptions as we were taught them, petting and stroking them, and passing them on to others.

Which isn’t to say that what our guts tell us, or what we do know for certain, can’t be applied, and that we should throw out peeves altogether, especially in the fanfic world, because so much of what fans “write” is sheer crap. Most people need help, and there’s no harm in telling them that it’s okay or right to say Wes’, if it means we can concentrate on getting them to write better sentences all the way around, or not write idiotic stories. You pick your battles, you know? But it’s important, I think, to recognize that not all of what we’re really adamant or Cranky McCrankpants about is really right or wrong. There are all kinds of possibilities (not least of which is how language is taught regionally), which makes it a) hard to learn what’s really right or wrong, and b) kind of fun, because the language is changing.

We’re not speaking Latin or ancient Greek or whatever — we’re speaking and writing an evolving language where things are constantly in flux. It’s harder to learn what’s right or wrong, but it also means the language keeps up with us. I have peers in editing who despise neologisms and slang phrases and speech patterns that reflect current usage. In the past two days on my copyediting list, I’ve watched what seems to be a relatively intelligent bunch despair over how most people say “and he’s like, all pissed off, and then I’m going, ‘hey, asshat,’ and then he goes, ‘whoa.’” They kept talking about today’s stupid kids replacing said/says with like and going, and I wanted to say, “Um... I’m like, whoa, dudes, because I’m in my forties and I talk that way when I’m with friends.” And I often just love new words and phrases — where would Buffy have been without that wonderful wordplay, for instance, like “could you vague that up for me?” and “I can’t believe you of all people are trying to Scully me.” Not being able to coin words like asshat or fuckwit would impoverish our language. Stuff like that is just fun. It’s what makes English exciting, that we can come up with phrases like “friend me” to describe the process of adding to your LJ friends list, rather than say “add me to your friends list.” So I don’t think I can ever join the fusty brigade and sit there with a pointy hat and decry the misuse of English or the horror of verbing nouns (or nominalizing verbs—hee!), because frankly, it often serves me well. A lot of times I despair over misuse and stupidity and especially wretched jargony bizness talk, but I’m kind of shocked at how quick to judge most people are when they’re not even going on real information.

Yeah, when I read fanfic my peeve buttons get tripped up the wazoo. I think at times if I see one more Buffy story with the word crepuscular every other page, or another Mag 7 story written in craptastic dialect with yer for your and everyone's readin' and ponderin', or see entire stories where there are simply no commas, I might actually explode. Overall I preach tolerance. But mostly I preach it so that we can first figure out whether it’s really right or wrong, and then once we know that, go after the person committing errors with a big sharp pointy stick and hurt them. I think it’s important to know the diff between what are peeves — for me, there is no worse sin than homonym and homophone abuse, and at times I fantasize about actually killing people who refuse to remember that led is the past tense of to lead — and what is really correct or incorrect grammar/usage. The more we know, the wider our understanding, the easier the distinction is made. And then, once we know, we can kill the people who don’t do it right.

Date: 2003-11-26 10:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] voleuse.livejournal.com
I love you.

I have the same doubts about a lot of supposed grammar problems, and I have to teach other people how to write properly. Trying to decide what to correct is nerve-wracking.

I commit the same supposed mistakes with prepositions and beginning sentences with conjunctions, but if I'm teaching them to write academic papers, do I tell them it's okay? How much of what I do is preparation, and how much of it is perpetuation?

Anyway. Thanks for the food for thought.

Date: 2003-11-26 08:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwyn-r.livejournal.com
Wow, yeah, that would be a lot harder. It's easier for me in that I only have to "educate" my clients, and it's their choice in the long run to do it as I've explained, or their way (usually, of course, they pick their way). But it's a whole other thing when you've got an audience to educate, one that kind of needs to know those things, or at least get a sense of what's right and wrong -- even if it may be only perpetuating something commonly held that way. Yikes!

Date: 2003-11-26 10:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-larkspur.livejournal.com
I'm really enjoying reading your posts on writing/editing/word usage. I have a peeve that I hear often enough to wonder if I'm in the wrong.

I hate when people say "but yet". It seems redundant. I think they should just say "yet", or say "and yet". Or "but".

What do you think? Am I just too picky?

Have a happy Thanksgiving if you celebrate it.

Date: 2003-11-26 08:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwyn-r.livejournal.com
Yeah, it is definitely redundant, but I think so much of speech is, which makes it harder to deal with. Speech is informal, and so people say things that they have no idea sounds so pointless -- I have a friend who says "it's like going" every other phrase. I'm horribly cruel to her about it, because fillers drive me nuts, but it's a perfect example of how we fill spaces in speech we wouldn't write -- I know she would never put that down on paper, but it's an unconscious gesture in talking. Another friend of mine goes through phases, and for about a two year span his phrase was "literally" for everything, as an intensifier, when nothing was literal, and then "again" when he wasn't adding anything to sentences. I'd bet the but yet thing is like that, where people are sort of adding words they don't need because they feel like it sounds right to them.

Date: 2003-11-26 10:54 am (UTC)
ext_841: (Default)
From: [identity profile] cathexys.livejournal.com
Yeah for anthimeria!!! My favorite recent one is that I've memoried posts all over the place :-)

I love the English language (especially American) exactly because it is so flexible and alive and ever-changing, and if that means that slang enters standard English and that certain older expressions disappear, that's a price I gladly accept if it means it produces a language as rich and vibrant and visceral as yours!

Luckily, I have very few grammar pet peeves, but I constantly realize that much of the stuff I teach (and some of which I unteach) may not be exactly correct. I comfort myself with the fact that most will not remember the rules (right or wrong) anyway :-)

Finally, just because I've long been waiting to share my ever favorite not-even homonym fanfic mistake (and don't think I've ever seen it repeated): how about a urethral [after-sex] glow? (and no, they weren't into watersports :-)

Date: 2003-11-26 08:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwyn-r.livejournal.com
Oh, I love that! I hadn't heard memoried, but it's great! Of course, my eye immediately sees a typo for memorized, but once I get used to it, that will come in very handy.

I'm glad, though, that there are people like you out there teaching and unteaching -- it's good to know that there's still lots of interest out there and that kids will get the benefit of such interests.

Date: 2003-11-26 01:07 pm (UTC)
ext_15108: (Default)
From: [identity profile] varina8.livejournal.com
I loved this post. I'm going to save it and put it on the wall. You're absolutely right about the vitality and flexibility of a living language -- and about discovering how much you don't know the further you delve into a language and its usage. Thanks so much for writing these essays.

Date: 2003-11-26 08:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwyn-r.livejournal.com
Heee -- but hey, fix my typos, okay? I'm the wordl's worst typist, and much as I try to reread my posts, the screen isn't always my friend when it comes to seeing my own errors. ;-)

Date: 2003-11-26 10:06 pm (UTC)
ext_15108: (Default)
From: [identity profile] varina8.livejournal.com
I sooooooo identify with the screen angst, plus I tend to compound the problem by typing without my glasses on.

fanfic pet peeve

Date: 2003-11-26 01:22 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I wrote an entire essay of pet peeves and wanted to post it in the fanfic section of several Buffy boards. The thing that stops me is I have never published any fanfic myself. I felt I had no right to criticize the endeavors of those who actually finish a story and put it out there for the world to see . And I know how important encouragement is to a writer. Criticism, even valid good criticism, can be so wounding to a writer.

Yet, I so wanted to tell the writers who were doing such an almost great job: Good stories, good style, spoiled by a few mistakes. So now that you have opened the subject I will say just a little bit. I certainly won’t hijack your journal to make it a venue for my entire pet peeve essay.

So I will just mention one thing that drives me crazy: Writers who are afraid to use the word “said.” They think up a hundred different ways to show their characters speaking. Speech tags such as, “he offered,” “he growled,” “she sighed,” “he retorted,” “she countered,” and on and on. And when the writers who are hooked on these tags do use the word “said,” it is almost always accompanied by an adverb or two and sometimes with a supporting sentence to further explain the speaker’s intent, emotion, or feeling. Some of the tags are not even physically possible. It is almost impossible to “grunt” a sentence, or to “growl” words.

I find this writing very distracting and when I encounter it, I simply quit reading. And this bothers me because I frequently find this in stories where the writing is otherwise quite good. But I can’t finish the stories because the dialogue gilding keeps poking my pet peeve hot buttons and reminding me that I am reading.

By the way, Gwyneth, you are not guilty of the above transgression and I enjoy your fanfic immensely.

Thanks for bringing up this subject. It is not often that I encounter others who have such a respect for the language.

Diane

Re: fanfic pet peeve

Date: 2003-11-26 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwyn-r.livejournal.com
Yeah, that said thing is just... it really is probably the most laughable thing about fanfic, because it's easy to spot the really bad writers who couldn't put a sentence together to save their lives, but even some of the best writers are terribly afraid of something as simple as said or says. I love being able to emphasize feelings or something particular about a piece of dialog, but it wouldn't be emphasis or really interesting description if I did it every other sentence, you know? That point, though, is tought to get across. In a future entry, I'm going to discuss the whole "elegant variation" thing, and maybe dissect what goes on with people who are afraid of repeating words, look at some of the things we read in writing instruction books or hear from teachers/workshops, and try to blow some dust off those things. I realize it's unlikely to reach the ears of people who need to hear it, but hey... never stopped me before. ;-)

Nice to hear from you again -- glad you're still out there!

Date: 2003-11-26 04:43 pm (UTC)
ext_6848: (Default)
From: [identity profile] klia.livejournal.com
Remember how you were told over and over that ain’t ain’t in the dictionary? Well, not only is it in every dictionary, but for years, relatively educated people said it all the time.

I didn't know this until I started reading Patrick O'Brian, and boy, was it a shock! I really had to rewire my brain to stop myself thinking Jack was, well, kind of dumb. But, no, "ain't" really was used back then. Wow.

Thanks for another interesting and helpful post!

Date: 2003-11-26 08:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwyn-r.livejournal.com
That's yet one more reason I love a good historical drama -- because people can see and hear it! In Sharpe's, for instance, you'll hear the gentlemen of breeding say ain't quite a bit, and I was pleased when one character said "He don't hunt? He don't *hunt*?" I'm sure there were perplexed viewers who thought it was odd someone educated would say that, but it certainly was more common way back when.

Date: 2003-11-27 12:57 am (UTC)
ext_6848: (Default)
From: [identity profile] klia.livejournal.com
In Sharpe's, for instance, you'll hear the gentlemen of breeding say ain't quite a bit, and I was pleased when one character said "He don't hunt? He don't *hunt*?"

I never got through all the Sharpe books, but I read a good number of them, and I swear, I don't remember that. I'm sure you're right, it's just my crappy memory not kicking in again, but it bugs me that it didn't register.

On that note, I'd like to nominate a phrase for eradication: "Where you're at". It drives me berserk. Okay, now you're going to tell me it's not actually wrong, and the teacher who taught me it was wrong *was wrong*. I mean, I'm flexible, but I'm no circus contortionist. *g*

Gobble, gobble. Have a nice Turkey Day.

Date: 2003-11-27 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] claudia-yvr.livejournal.com
Great post, Gwyn! Language is indeed constantly changing and evolving; however, that doesn't quite excuse some of the appalling grammar, punctuation and spelling that abounds online. (The common mistake that most drives me crazy? Between you and I (http://www.yourdictionary.com/library/drlang002.html) makes me want to scream "between you and ME" MEMEMEMEMEME. ME. Ahem.) That said, the Internet is also a treasure trove of lovely fic and thought-provoking dialogue, so I agree that tolerance is of the good.
Image

Happy birthday! May this day year be your best ever!

Date: 2003-11-27 09:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gwyn-r.livejournal.com
Oh yeah, the you and I thing... about a year ago, my dad corrected me when I said "you and me" to him, and I had to break it to him that his lifelong correcting (and my mom's) was wrong. He was dubious until I workedit out for him, but he still says it that way himself. I'll make a note to tackle that sometime, maybe when I get to subject/verb agreement.

And squee! thank you for the birthday wishes. I'm having such a great week so far that I think it can only be fun!

Date: 2003-11-29 09:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] orthoepy.livejournal.com
(sent here by minim ...)

Preach it, sister!

I deal with people's peeves ALL THE TIME, and most of the time it comes down to two things: 1) they want to feel as if they are better than the folks who do commit their unspeakable peeve 2) they have some cockamamie idea that language is supposed to be logical.

Huh? What other fields of human endeavor are logical? Logicians have to have a special language just to talk about formal logic because English just isn't logical enough!

I try to say "you know, you can speak and write however you like, but changing others' speech and writing is a lost cause" and then they get upset and go off in a huff. I can't say I'm usually too disappointed.

Anyway, thanks for such a great post!

Date: 2003-12-05 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] namastenancy.livejournal.com
NOT YOU AND I????? It's you and MEMEMEMEMEMEMEM????
But I swear my long ago English teacher drummed this into me as "It's you and I."
Could she possibly have been wrong?
Oh no - that must mean that there is not Santa Claus either.
Quelle Horrors!

namaste SF Nancy

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123 456
78910111213
14151617181920
2122 2324 252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 02:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios