![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Even though I'm very disgusted with the whole vid sharing thing right now, I've posted a new vid. Yes, that's a big L painted on my forehead.
Fraternité
Fandom: Brotherhood of the Wolf
Song: Blue Lily Red Lotus
Artist: Susheela Raman
File: QT Divx avi, 23.6MB
I recommend VLC media player (there's a link at my site) as always -- makes this look much better.
I can't say that anyone who hasn't seen the movie will be able to get much out of this, but then, I never know. I thought people who hadn't seen Deadwood wouldn't be able to parse Come to Jesus, but apparently I was wrong. So.
In the "because I am stupid" department. Last night when I was making the web encoded version of this, I realized that I'm about thisfar from committing seppuku over this encoding thing. Everyone else I see around me gets these flawless encodes that have no pixelization to speak of, and yet I cannot seem to achieve that. I suppose I should just be happy that I have a way to get a large window file up at a reasonable DL size, but I want these flawless encodes, too. The instructions at astolat's LJ that everyone mentions are for Windows, and I'm a Macolyte. I keep fiddling with things, trying programs, to no avail. These Divx avis are the only thing I know how to make, but they pixelate in strange places for no discernible reason. I don't have a lot of the fancyass programs many vidders do, either. I've literally begged people for their processes to get a better encode, but... they never respond. I find this really discouraging. For the most part this file looks good, I think, but.. it could be a lot better.
Anyway. The one thing I did manage to figure out last night after months of frustration was that somewhere along the line, in DLing all these encoding programs, my settings for the QT player had been pretty much bunged, and that was why they were reading my avi files so poorly. Here I roll my eyes at the people who email me and whine about how their computer won't let them watch my vids (I always say, if you're on a Windows computer, please go into your WMP defaults and uncheck "make WMP your default player" and like magic, it works!), and here I didn't even think to go back and check if my default settings had been bunged up. Yup. So I reset them, looking for the one that mentions avis, and sure enough, it plays the files less herky jerky than it has been recently. You know that thing about how if you give a bunch of monkeys typewriters? Yeah.
So, the dumbass finally at least figured that out. The good news is that I can now check the encodes in QT without wanting to cry, so I can make sure everything's copacetic in both QT and VLC. The bad news is, they still look like shit in the regular QT player -- seems utterly unable to handle a slow pan and certain other types of shots, and it's way, way mushy. But at least the superfast cuts in this don't disappear completely now in the QT player.
But. On with the void!
Fraternité
Fandom: Brotherhood of the Wolf
Song: Blue Lily Red Lotus
Artist: Susheela Raman
File: QT Divx avi, 23.6MB
I recommend VLC media player (there's a link at my site) as always -- makes this look much better.
I can't say that anyone who hasn't seen the movie will be able to get much out of this, but then, I never know. I thought people who hadn't seen Deadwood wouldn't be able to parse Come to Jesus, but apparently I was wrong. So.
In the "because I am stupid" department. Last night when I was making the web encoded version of this, I realized that I'm about thisfar from committing seppuku over this encoding thing. Everyone else I see around me gets these flawless encodes that have no pixelization to speak of, and yet I cannot seem to achieve that. I suppose I should just be happy that I have a way to get a large window file up at a reasonable DL size, but I want these flawless encodes, too. The instructions at astolat's LJ that everyone mentions are for Windows, and I'm a Macolyte. I keep fiddling with things, trying programs, to no avail. These Divx avis are the only thing I know how to make, but they pixelate in strange places for no discernible reason. I don't have a lot of the fancyass programs many vidders do, either. I've literally begged people for their processes to get a better encode, but... they never respond. I find this really discouraging. For the most part this file looks good, I think, but.. it could be a lot better.
Anyway. The one thing I did manage to figure out last night after months of frustration was that somewhere along the line, in DLing all these encoding programs, my settings for the QT player had been pretty much bunged, and that was why they were reading my avi files so poorly. Here I roll my eyes at the people who email me and whine about how their computer won't let them watch my vids (I always say, if you're on a Windows computer, please go into your WMP defaults and uncheck "make WMP your default player" and like magic, it works!), and here I didn't even think to go back and check if my default settings had been bunged up. Yup. So I reset them, looking for the one that mentions avis, and sure enough, it plays the files less herky jerky than it has been recently. You know that thing about how if you give a bunch of monkeys typewriters? Yeah.
So, the dumbass finally at least figured that out. The good news is that I can now check the encodes in QT without wanting to cry, so I can make sure everything's copacetic in both QT and VLC. The bad news is, they still look like shit in the regular QT player -- seems utterly unable to handle a slow pan and certain other types of shots, and it's way, way mushy. But at least the superfast cuts in this don't disappear completely now in the QT player.
But. On with the void!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 09:31 pm (UTC)I have to catch up on the vidlets! You guys are making it impossible to keep up, but I want to see them all. It's insane January vid *watching* is what it is.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 05:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 06:07 pm (UTC)Now I rilly rilly rilly want to watch that movie again. So. freaking. pretty.
But I love the cuts in the faster part at the end (and all throughout)...it helps when you tell me what you're doing, because then I can look for it and appreciate it. I can tell already that the song is going to be stuck in my head, and I'm going to be watching it repeatedly for the next month.
I hope your dad is doing well, btw.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 09:43 pm (UTC)Dad seems okay, I just called him, but he's still kind of disoriented, and it's situations like this where I realize how very old he is.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 07:58 pm (UTC)So, the vid. LOVE IT! I've been waiting for this since you did your little poll 'lo these many months ago and I'm not disappointed about the wait!
Unusual choice of music but it so totally works. Unusual movie so why shouldn't it have unusal music. The pacing was wonderful. Slow and rather dreamy at first, then the beat steps up and then steps up again. Great clip choices.
I must go back and watch it again. This one ranks up with my favorite vids.
BTW? The coding on my was perfect. No errant pixel patches or anything else.
Well shit! Now I need BotW icons! sigh! an icon junkies work is never done!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 09:47 pm (UTC)I need some BOTW icons, too. I think I might try to capture some jpgs from the clips I dumped in, and see if I can come up with anything. If i do and you want some, just let me know.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 05:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-25 05:59 pm (UTC)It's really gorgeous and unlike any other film you'll ever see. If I can get more people to give it a try, I will have succeeded!
is reduced to surfer-talk
Date: 2006-01-25 10:34 am (UTC)So awesome.
Seriously.
I had forgotten just how very strange that movie was...
This whole vid was just gorgeous (no pixelization, slowing, or jerking problems for me, playing with Realplayer v.10 on WinXP, if you're at all interested in the technicals), and I adored the music. Atmospheric, dynamic, and the very last image of the ash on the wind was a perfect visual complement to the sound.
Cool.
I'm gonna have to watch the movie again, aren't I?
Re: is reduced to surfer-talk
Date: 2006-01-25 06:19 pm (UTC)It really is the craziest movie, but what I love about it is that it also has some great underlying real drama in it, and that it never makes the characters too comically outrageous. You do really care for them, and for what they are doing, and especially for Fronsac and how he wants to stop the killings and the group who's perpetrating them, and avenge Mani's death. I do so love a bit of reVENge.
Re: is reduced to surfer-talk
Date: 2006-01-27 01:06 am (UTC)One of the things that I love about the movie is that it is so very, well, French. That combination of passionate sincerity with a sort of faintly amused world-weariness is unique, particularly in an action-ish movie.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 05:19 am (UTC)Love the contrast between the slower, elegant first half, where it seems like the story is being laid out and resolved, and then you shift gears not once but twice into showing all of the bit and pieces left out or still to come. You did wonderful things with this lovely source. :} If I hadn't seen the movie already, this would easily put it on my must-see list.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-26 06:07 pm (UTC)I need to get over and catch up on all the insane vidding projects now that this is finished. I'm so far behind and I want to see what you all are doing!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 03:57 am (UTC)Also? That music kicks ass.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 04:37 pm (UTC)The stuff flung on the statue is punkins! That's the scene I always refer to as the pumpkin-hunt; the marquis (little crush-boy that he is, so in love with Fronsac), Fronsac, and Mani are all "testing" out their weapons of choice on poor unsuspecting pumpkins before they hunt. It cracks me up because the pumpkins blow up in such spectacular fashion, way more than a real pumpkin would, and one of them even pours liquified pumpkin innards out of a round hole -- I guess we're supposed to believe the pistols are that powerful. It's emblematic of what I love in that movie -- it's so OTT and yet... somehow, not at the same time. That pumpkin that gets splatted on the statue just seemed very visually arresting -- it's Mani's tomahawk throw, I believe. Right after he flips his hair back. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-27 07:22 pm (UTC)Thanks for reminding me about what's going on with the punkins. Obviously, I need to watch this movie again!